|
|||||
GOOD BLACKJACK STAKE? All of us, including me, have opinions on Blackjack - especially after playing some of it. But in this book I tried not to just to give opinions on how I felt, but at the same time use computer simulation to tell me and us what happens after millions or billions of hands of Blackjack are played. This answer ... on Blackjack stakes ... I found startling ... but now I understand why. From my times playing Blackjack, I felt that I was "certain" that the amount of stake you have absolutely matters. For example, a person at a $5 table who stakes themselves only $20 seems to be soon gone. But those who at a $5 table stake themselves at perhaps $200 might have time to see if they can put together a win. But what does the computer simulation say? It says something totally different. It says ... "It does not matter. The amount of the Stake just does not matter." This was after millions or perhaps billions of blackjack card simulations, the stakes did not matter. But Why? Well, what we emotionally "think" we see with our eyes is not always true. And yes, I a pragmatic math person, should have also seen this earlier. Unless a betting system or staking system somehow ties to the changing odds of the blackjack deck, neither of them matter. We are to an extent, only amusing ourselves. What the simulations showed is what I should have guessed. Those who stake themselves low amounts do not lose more. They just see far more blackjack tables than those of us who stake ourselves higher. Yes, for a staking or betting system to matter, it would have to tie somehow to the current changing odds of the Blackjack table. And therefore betting or staking schemes, at least when all by themselves, ... do not change our odds of winning.
|
|||||
Go to More about this Book by Clicking here please note: "excerpts" of our books shown here are excerpt of our ideas in the books. It will not be word for word. |
|||||